Home
DOGMA BALLS
BUSINESS
REALITY
EDUCATION
EMERGENCY!
RECONSTRUCTION
SOCIAL CAPITALISM
Home
DOGMA BALLS
BUSINESS
REALITY
EDUCATION
EMERGENCY!
RECONSTRUCTION
SOCIAL CAPITALISM
More
  • Home
  • DOGMA BALLS
  • BUSINESS
  • REALITY
  • EDUCATION
  • EMERGENCY!
  • RECONSTRUCTION
  • SOCIAL CAPITALISM
  • Home
  • DOGMA BALLS
  • BUSINESS
  • REALITY
  • EDUCATION
  • EMERGENCY!
  • RECONSTRUCTION
  • SOCIAL CAPITALISM
WE'VE DRIFTED INTO TREACHEROUS WATERS

CONSTITUTIONAL RECONSTRUCTIONISM

This page explains how nearly all United States government activity is illegitimate, what your rights actually are, and how we can negotiate a peaceful revolution.

CORE COMPONENTS

REAL CONSENT

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

REAL CONSENT

The NH Constitution grants no authority without the consent of the people.


The currently living people, not the dead ones.


Without mechanisms for peaceful non-participation in social and government activity, there is no legitimacy to democracies.

JUMP TO SECTION

DUE PROCESS

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

REAL CONSENT

We've been ignoring true due process to empower a global corpostate's rule over the American people for over a century.


The 4th Amendment is not a reason to ignore the 5th. It places additional restrictions on warrants; it doesn't say that they can be used to skip due process.

JUMP TO SECTION

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

The American Bar Association has separated Americans from their rights under the guise of certifying "legitimate" lawyers.


The reality is that these unconstitutional guilds have more power over how lawyers can represent the American people than the Constitution does.

JUMP TO SECTION

CONSENT IS MANDATORY

THE ABSENCE OF COERCION

There are no amount of elections, signed papers, or posted placards that can compensate for the presence of coercion. The United States Government derives its legitimacy from the absence of coercion. The presence of coercive police operating outside of due process in any regard invalidates any United States government actions as fraudulent and not approved by the authority of the people.

ENFORCING =/= FORCING

Enforcing laws through incentives or consequences (like loss of privileges) is categorically different from forcing compliance through physical or legal coercion against rights. Enforcement still presumes general volition; force does not. The Constitution authorizes enforcement, not coercion, punishment, or force.

CONSENT MECHANISMS

The United States Government and any states, agencies, laws, policies, and executive orders must all ensure adequate consent at all times. Punitive actions used to enforce laws and regulations cannot infringe upon the rights defined in the constitution. Without options for peaceful and respectful non-participation, American democracy is invalid.

RIGHTS CAN'T BE REVOKED

TRUE DUE PROCESS...

REMOVAL OF BENEFIT EXCEPTION

REMOVAL OF BENEFIT EXCEPTION

Due process means someone understanding in an official capacity what they are being charged with, what the potential outcomes are, and consenting to trial or punitive action. The government has zero authority to punish seize people or property outside this.

REMOVAL OF BENEFIT EXCEPTION

REMOVAL OF BENEFIT EXCEPTION

REMOVAL OF BENEFIT EXCEPTION

There obviously needs to be mechanisms for justice when people or police aren't able to deter or stop a crime actively. It's just not allowed to violate our rights. Fortunately, removing any benefits that the government provides that aren't constitutionally guaranteed is valid.

ATTRACT MORE WITH HONEY

REMOVAL OF BENEFIT EXCEPTION

ATTRACT MORE WITH HONEY

Not only is the coercive compliance strategy unethical and constitutionally illegal, it's also less effective! You end up with a whole bunch of side effects that far outweigh the benefit of appearing to have things under control. Compliance through benefits is much more effective.

LEARN ABOUT SOCIAL CAPITALISM & GOVERNMENT ENTERPRISE

Find out more

RIGHTS, SERVICES, & BENEFITS

OUR RIGHTS

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

Our rights are defined in various amendments throughout the constitution, with the entire government's authority being founded in the consent of all. This means that if the United States government is sustaining it's validity by coercing the people in violation of their clearly defined rights, then its not valid at all.

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

The government is not required to provide any services. If it chooses to do so, it must be via truly consenting taxation and provide services that are equally accessible to all. If people become dependent on these services for survival, they cannot be removed for the enforcement of non-constitutional policies.

BENEFITS

ESSENTIAL SERVICES

BENEFITS

The government is not prevented from establishing any amount of its own commercial activities, so long as it's not using its legal advantage to dominate markets. There are plenty of avenues for the government to be a natural market regular while generating revenue for benefits for the people. Assuming their true luxuries, they can be removed as enforcement.

THE US HAS DRIFTED FAR FROM ITS ORIGINAL INTENT

RESTORING DUE PROCESS

The 4th and 5th Amendments of the US Constitution grant the people rights.


These rights don't grant the government authority; they explicitly limit it.


But somehow, the 4th is being used to bypass the 5th.

CORE ARGUMENT

4TH AMENDMENT

4TH AMENDMENT

4TH AMENDMENT

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

5TH AMENDMENT

4TH AMENDMENT

4TH AMENDMENT

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

THE VIOLATION

4TH AMENDMENT

THE VIOLATION

Nearly all US and State agencies and police departments use the 4th amendment to violate the 5th when the Constitution grants no authorization to use one government limitation as a workaround for another limitation.


Warrants can only be for people and property for whom due process doesn't apply, which would be stolen property or people who have already been convicted or consented to be charged in court.



REAL DUE PROCESS

REPRESENTATION & CONSENT

Genuine due process involves the chance for someone to represent themselves before a judge before being deprived of life, liberty, or property.


The only thing that can go against due process is active harm; not threatened harm, not harm that occurred, but active harm.

NO POLICY OR PRECEDENT...

No amount of policy or precedence can invalidate due process, as Marbury vs Madison (1803) clarifies that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and has the potential to invalidate any policy or precedence imposed on top of it. Without a chance for someone to argue their case as such, due process isn't occurring.


Creating policy that allows police to skip due process on the basis of probable cause doesn't make them valid.

VALID WARRANTS

You may be wondering why are warrants even mentioned if due process invalidates them?


First, the Founders were really against the abusive warrants of the British government of the time. They wanted to be especially clear that warrants are corrosive to real liberty.

Second, you can still search for stolen property or people who have already been duly processed based on probably cause.

HOW AMERICANS WERE SEPARATED FROM THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

Much of modern oppression functions off the abuse of "common sense." It's "common sense" that we need someone to certify lawyers as legitimate so we don't get ripped off.


It is also, however, reality that the American Bar Association has led the separation of Americans from their rights.

CORE ARGUMENTS

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

Let's do some simple math here. The people have the Constitutional right to Counsel. The government has no constitutional authority to regulate access to counsel, and even if it did, it wouldn't be able to compromise the defined rights of the people.

POLICIES VS LAW

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

Marbury vs Madison (1803) set the precedent against precedence, despite how much modern government ignores the ruling. The Constitution is the supreme Law of the Land, and no law, policy, or administrative preference can overrule constitutional rights.

TREASONOUS ACT

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

TREASONOUS ACT

This is no minor semantic issue. The American Bar Association and all of the state bar associations that make the prioritization of bar norms over the Constitution official are committing treason against the American people. They have built a false empire.

  • CORRUPTION
  • WHO DAS
  • DISCLAIMER

CONTACT DAS VIA SIGNAL: DASNIEL.19


SUPPORT DAS ON PATREON

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept