EMERGENT ANTHROPOLOGY

Emergent Behavior Studies (EBS) is a framework for analyzing behavior and culture, grounded in the theory that behavior is emergent, shaped by the interplay of thoughts, beliefs, memories, conditioning, and present environmental contexts.

EBS-EC is a non-dual interpretation that the thoughts, beliefs, and memories themselves are theoretically just "environmental contexts" in the form of specific neural activation patterns in your brain (or your gut). 

The distinction is significant, as it opens new pathways to adjust the conscious experience that don't necessarily requiring the linear logic or narrative from within the conscious experience.

EBS attempts to extend and apply the Emergent Causal Framework (ECF) and Emergent Awareness Theory (EAT) but holds independent explanatory power regarding human behavior regardless of the validity of these components. 

While ECF and EAT explore the mechanics of causality, emergent awareness and conscious choice, EBS applies these principles to real-world human interactions. 

Within the EBS framework;

behavior is the emergent output of an agent's interactions with its environment, shaped by multiple layers of awareness, conditioning, and conscious choice

agent is any entity with a relatively autonomous capacity for complex conscious choice

awareness is knowledge about causal flow in a complex system that emerges as a precursor to conscious choice on all levels of life

consciousness the experience of high-order, self-referential awareness as determined by a synchrony of subconscious choices being made throughout all layers of our physicality based on environmental contexts

choices are the individual selections that biological systems make as a result of awareness, made in synchrony throughout multiple emergent layers of living complexity. these can be conscious or subconscious

morality is the complex system of beliefs and experiences that shape an individual's behavior, with both conscious and subconscious components

conditioning refers to the physical, cognitive, and social training that an agent may have which assists in the availability of decisions

A FUNDAMENTALLY AMORAL APPROACH

EBS insists upon an amoral approach to understanding behavior. 

There is no universal "right" behavior to serve as a benchmark for all individuals and societies, and we must avoid imposing our own morality when assessing the morals and behaviors of others.

Morality is traditionally defined as someone's values determining good and bad, but someone needs to have the value of thinking within the context of that system in the first place.

Instead of arbitrarily selecting one traditional morality to judge all by, EBS recognizes:

The emergent nature of individual morality; how personal moral frameworks form through lived experiences and how one processes information.

The emergent nature of social morality; how collective moral norms arise when multiple individuals interact.

The cyclical causality between personal and social morality; how each level continuously reinforces and reshapes the other.

Within this framework, good and bad are not objective truths but relative to the moral frameworks of the agent, group, or society in question. 

The implications are significant: what makes someone "bad" in one context may make them "good" in another.

By adopting an amoral stance in behavioral studies, EBS seeks to minimize bias and projection to analyze behavior as accurately as possible.

UNDERSTANDING THE FUNDAMENTAL CONSTRAINT OF EMERGENCE

Human consciousness emerges at a specific layer of reality's emergent structure—constrained between:

Upward Causality – The physical and biological systems that generate consciousness.

Downward Causality – Higher-order conscious structures such as relationships, societies, and potentially even God.

This fundamental constraint does not eliminate agency but redefines it as constrained will rather than free will. 

Instead of choices existing independently of prior causes, all decisions are shaped by environmental conditions and prior conditioning. 

This perspective allows for a more nuanced, t understanding of human behavior rather than relying on outdated notions of absolute free will or linear determinism driving all activity.

ATTEMPTING AND CONSTRUCTING AGENCY

While traditional notions of free will assume that people of "sound mind" have plain and complete agency, EBS positions agency within the emergently determined domain of constrained will, meaning that while our situation is determined by previous actions, we're still capable of constructing abstract choice structures that give us meaningful agency within our constrained circumstances.

Agency isn't a static trait but a dynamic, self-reinforcing process. Each conscious choice an agent makes influences the availability of future choice, both internally and externally via:

Reinforcing Cognitive Pathways – Repeated decisions establish mental patterns, making certain choices easier or more intuitive over time.

Altering the Structures of Choice – Through iterative engagement despite any immediate failures to produce new outcomes, new decision pathways can emerge that were previously unavailable or unrecognized. 

For example, someone with limited decision-making confidence may struggle to assert themselves in social situations. 

However, by intentionally making small choices to engage, each successful interaction alters their perceived range of options and likelihood of "success". 

What initially required extreme effort becomes an automatic part of their behavioral landscape.

In this way, agency expands through action: the more one engages with choices, the more choices become available.

However, this process is nonlinear—not every choice directly expands agency. Some choices reinforce existing constraints, solidifying cognitive and behavioral conditioning that both empowers and limits our choices. 

Thus, the development of agency is not just about making choices directly to alter our environment, but also making choices that allow ourselves more choices in the future.

The Interplay Between Individual Effort and Environmental Influence

Because agency emerges through both internal choice-making and external environmental structuring, its development is best understood as an iterative feedback loop:

Agents Make Choices – These choices reinforce or reshape their cognitive and behavioral structures.

Choices Generate Consequences – Some choices expand perceived possibilities, while others reinforce constraints.

The Environment Responds – Social structures, institutions, and interpersonal interactions influence which choices are reinforced or discouraged.

The Agent Adapts – Based on reinforcement, constraints shift, altering the agent’s range of available choices.

This iterative process means agency is not merely possessed—it is constructed, expanded, or diminished over time.

Implications for Agency Expansion

~ Intentional Decision-Making – By being aware of how choices reinforce behavioral structures, individuals can deliberately shape their own agency over time.

~ Strategic Environmental Engagement – Seeking environments that support choice expansion—through education, relationships, or cultural exposure—can accelerate agency development.

~ Recognizing Structural Constraints – Understanding that agency is constrained rather than purely "free" allows for a more realistic approach to change, both personally and societally.

Thus, agency is best seen as an emergent phenomenon, constantly shaped by the interplay between internal choices and external conditions. 

By actively iterating on decision-making processes while strategically engaging with supportive environments, an agent can meaningfully expand their range of possibilities, even within the inherent constraints of physical existence.

THE EMERGENCE OF RELATIONSHIPS

Just as agency itself emerges from constrained will and iterative choice, relationships between agents are emergent systems—not reducible to either participant alone, but arising from the dynamic interactions between them. 

The perception of the relationship becomes its own component in the causal system, in addition to the individuals in the relationship.

Relationships as Emergent Systems

A relationship is not merely the sum of two agents' individual characteristics but a pattern of interaction that forms a distinct system. 

For example, consider a friendship: while it may begin as a series of individual interactions, over time, a shared behavioral system emerges—inside jokes, unspoken understandings, and expectations develop that neither friend explicitly designed, yet now exist as part of the relationship’s structure.

The Relationship as a Third Entity

Once established, relationships develop a form of persistence beyond the moment-to-moment interactions of the agents. In many cases, relationships begin to function as quasi-autonomous systems, exerting influence over the agents involved.

This means:

~ A relationship can "persist" even when neither agent is consciously engaged (e.g., two estranged friends still "have" a friendship, even in absence).

~ The relationship exerts downward causality on both agents—altering their choices and behaviors within its context. (e.g., A romantic relationship may influence career choices, social circles, or even personal identity).

~ Its emergent structure may enforce behavioral inertia, meaning agents feel compelled to act in ways that maintain the system, even when they personally wish to change (e.g., dysfunctional family dynamics persisting despite individual efforts).

In this way, relationships behave as emergent systems that are "more than the sum of their parts", taking on properties and constraints that neither agent alone fully dictates.

The Feedback Loop of Social Emergence

Since all conscious relationships arise from the interplay between individual agency and emergent structures, they are both shaped by and shape the agents within them.

Individual choices shape the relationship’s structure. 

• Every interaction reinforces or alters its emergent patterns.

The relationship structure constrains future choices. 

• Once certain dynamics are established, they shape the default range of possible interactions.

Relationships interact with broader social systems. 

• Friendships, partnerships, and rivalries influence group dynamics, social norms, and cultural structures.

This cyclical feedback loop is what allows relationships to emerge, stabilize, and evolve over time.

Implications of Emergent Relationship Systems

Understanding relationships as emergent systems rather than static bonds has key implications:

Relational Growth Requires Iterative Adaptation – Changing a relationship is not about convincing one party to act differently, but about shifting the emergent interaction pattern itself.

Interpersonal Conflict Is Often a Structural Issue – Many relational tensions arise not from individual failings, but from the unintended consequences of the system’s self-sustaining dynamics.

Autonomy in Relationships Is Not Absolute – No agent can fully control a relationship alone; they can only influence its trajectory through iterative engagement.

Social Structures Reinforce Certain Relationship Types – Cultural, economic, and institutional forces shape the nature of permissible or encouraged relationship dynamics.

Ultimately, the study of emergent relationships within EBS reveals that interpersonal connections are not merely the interaction of individuals but the formation of living, evolving systems that transcend the individuals themselves.